Environmental Planning and Information Council v. Superior Court

1985 - 36 Cal.3d 188


The California Supreme Court held that an environmental organization can constitutionally proceed with a secondary boycott against advertisers of a newspaper in order to influence editorial policy. Because of the infringement on petitioner’s constitutional rights of free speech, the Supreme Court, upon application by petitioners for a writ of mandate, determined that there were no triable issues of fact and determined that petitioners were entitled to summary judgment. I was lead counsel for this matter.

TLG counsel of record: Tina A. Thomas



Keeping you up to date on the California Environmental Quality Act

VIEW BLOG   NEWSLETTER

Newsletter Signup

Stay up to date with CEQA News by signing up for our newsletter.